23.3 C
Ljubljana
nedelja, 22 maja, 2022

A new and most accurate analysis of elections from academic circles: Joe Biden’s election “victory” relied on a fraudulent counting process in the dead of night

by Peter Truden

»Late on Election Night 2020, President Donald J. Trump had a lead of around 100,000 votes in Wisconsin, a lead of around 300,000 votes in Michigan, and a lead of around 700,000 votes in Pennsylvania. Back-of-the-envelope calculations showed that in order to overtake President Trump, Joe Biden would have to substantially improve his performance in the remaining precincts — many of which were in heavily blue areas like Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia,« the latest academic election analysis reports.

A thorough and damning new analysis just published calls the legitimacy of this critical period into question and shows just how completely ridiculous and far-fetched the core of Joe Biden’s comeback really was in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. It flags four individual vote dumps critical to Joe Biden’s “victory” in these states and shows, convincingly, that their ratios of Biden votes to Trump votes were profoundly anomalous when compared to other dumps in those states and virtually every other vote dump across the country, Revolver reports.

The report is written in dry and academic language, filled with graphs, footnotes, and various hedges, but its implications could not be more obvious.

It starts out with the background on Michigan and Wisconsin — the famous “vote spikes” that were plainly ridiculous and fundamentally changed both the electoral reality and the narrative. The report reminds us of the infamous vote spikes in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Michigan

X-axis is the Month-Year Hour of the time, Y-axis is the number of votes as of that time, expressed in millions of votes. The red series is the running number of votes for Donald Trump, and the blue series the running number of votes for Joe Biden.

Wisconsin

X-axis is the Month-Year Hour of the time, Y-axis is the number of votes as of that time, expressed in millions of votes. The red series is the running number of votes for Donald Trump, and the blue series the running number of votes for Joe Biden.

The report is based on an analysis of the difference between successive updates in each state, each of which it calls “vote updates.”  In online discourse, these are often referred to as “vote dumps” or “vote batches.”

The report describes a measurement for showing the relationship between the number of votes Biden wins by (or loses by) in any given vote dump, and how well he did as a ratio of Trump’s votes in that vote dump, while controlling for size and political lean of a state. It thus normalizes the data across states, allowing for apples to apples comparisons. The key mathematical reason why these vote spikes are anomalous is that for every large vote dump heavily favoring Biden in any given area, you also would expect to have smaller vote dumps in the same area which favor him by similar margins. Quoting from the report:

»The believability of these updates relies on the premise that the one or two most Biden-favoring parts of the state (perhaps by ballot type) were counted entirely in these two batches.  If it cannot be shown that the ballots counted during these spikes were qualitatively different from all other vote updates in Michigan, then the results are likely too extreme along multiple dimensions to be accepted at face value.«

The four vote updates in question are: 

  1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
  2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
  3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
  4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

The burden of proof is now on Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, the Democratic party, and their various urban machine operatives to defend these results as legitimate.  The on-the-ground circumstances in these states had been suspicious for weeks and warranted investigation in their own right.  We now have the math to confirm our suspicions.  This report, in winding sentences and hedged language, lays it bare for all of us to see: Joe Biden’s election “victory” relied on a fraudulent counting process in the dead of night.

MORE: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020. A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night.

Share

Latest news

Dr. David Engels: “Who can predict his own future when the future of Europe seems to be so dark”

By Andrej Sekulović  David Engels is a Belgian conservative author, a historian, and a professor of Roman history, living in Poland. We spoke to him...

Environment-themed exhibition at Museum of Contemporary Art

By: J.S.,STA The Museum of Contemporary Art in Metelkova, Ljubljana, launched a group exhibition tonight in which artists are looking for a way out of...

Covid situation better still, Slovenia no longer wholly dark red on ECDC map

By: P.T., STA A total of 407 people tested positive for coronavirus in Slovenia on Wednesday, two-thirds of the figure reported a week ago, and...

Death toll of explosion at chemical factory Melamin rises to six

By: P.T., STA One of the two persons being treated in hospital for severe injuries sustained in last week's explosion at chemical company Melamin has...

Related news

Dr. David Engels: “Who can predict his own future when the future of Europe seems to be so dark”

By Andrej Sekulović  David Engels is a Belgian conservative author, a historian, and a professor of Roman history, living in Poland. We spoke to him...

The SDS party proposed a consultative referendum on the law on RTV Slovenia

By: C.R. In recent months, the number of citizens who are dissatisfied with the services provided by RTV Slovenia is increasing, and therefore propose the...

The medical profession is unanimous: Unfortunately, we are witnessing an attempt by the extreme Levica party to take over healthcare completely

By: Domen Mezeg / Nova24tv “The future Minister of Health Bešič Loredan may have a sincere intention, but it will be very difficult to reconcile...

NGOs in full swing

By Nicola de Felice 2,000 Sudanese, Somalis, and Yemenis are expected to land in the next two weeks, but Egyptians and Bengalis remain at the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share