By: Sara Kovač / Nova24tv.si
Nova24TV obtained a video from the European Parliament, where MP Ljudmila Novak stated a lot of nonsense and attacked the government of Janez Janša again. With this, she joined Blaž Zgaga, Tanja Fajon, Irena Joveva and others who exported untruths abroad.
According to Ljudmila Novak, Robert Golob was made by Janša’s government because it dismissed various directors, because it did a purge on RTV, a purge on STA. And then she added that she was sorry that NSi was a victim of this action. Novak is now an exporter of lies abroad, like Blaž Zgaga and the like, as she did not state that no purges are being carried out on RTV, but that long-term forces are mobbing and intimidating a handful fighting for a more balanced programme. Golob was not removed and replaced, but his term at Gen-I expired. It was the same with all other directors, while former STA director Bojan Veselinović grossly exploited the Slovenian Press Agency for dirty political games and grossly violated applicable regulations. At the end of his term, he was replaced by a new director, with whom the problems that Novak talks about miraculously disappeared.
Former president of the NSi party and MEP Ljudmila Novak was the biggest promoter of the left, she also contributed to Golob’s victory in the elections, which is why her victim is the NSi party. “I am sorry that my party is also a victim of such actions,” she said in the European Parliament. We must understand her work in the light of running for president, where if she wants to remain in the lens of the left-wing media, she must be aggressive towards Janša.
Novak is a mole of the left
Novak started taking an interest in Janša at the time when she was at the top of the NSI party. With her moves, she steered the party to the left, while forgetting the electorate of the party she led. At a time when it was clear that Marjan Šarec would no longer lead the government, and the SDS, NSI, DeSUS and SMC parties were considering the possibility of forming a new centre-right government, Novak did not miss the opportunity not to inveigh against Janša. “If someone harms the right with his destructive actions and inappropriate tweets, then this is the eternal president of the SDS,” she said. By doing so, she more than obviously wanted to harm the integration of the Slovenian right.
As a Member of the European Parliament, she began advocating the expulsion of the Hungarian FIDESZ party from the European People’s Party and supported a resolution condemning Hungary and Poland for “disrespecting” human rights. Although she was the first face of Christian Democracy for many years, she did not take a firm stand against the spread of LGBT ideology in schools. “Janša always takes me as a leftist, I claim to be a Christian Democrat,” she claims.
Instead of holding back on inappropriate comments at a time when the NSi party was part of the coalition, she appeared as a guest on Studio City, where she criticised Janša, thus of course casting a dark shadow on NSi. She accused Janša of the situation around the STA, and he was also to blame for the long-lasting complication regarding the election of European delegated prosecutors. She admitted that she herself was sceptical about NSi entering the government. “I have my own opinion on this,” she was clear, but added that Janša’s government had done a lot of good. “It presided very well. Unfortunately, the Prime Minister took care of some of the negative dramatic contributions, which cast a bad light on Slovenia’s presidency,” she added.
By persistently presenting Novak as one of the most popular politicians with the help of the obedient media, the transitional left used her to its advantage when the NSi party rose slightly on the public opinion ladder. That this is the case and that it was really all about artificially inflating Novak’s popularity, which was even higher than the popularity of President Borut Pahor, is proven by the fact that Marta Kos and Nataša Pirc Musar are the ones who are currently portrayed as the most possible candidates for Pahor’s successor.
The NSi party won eight seats at the expense of integration policy, one more than four years ago. It seems that the showdown with Janša, which was Novak’s modus operandi, is not as desirable among the voters of the NSi party as she may have thought and still thinks. However, as Novak’s recent statements in Brussels show, she is clearly trying to get the NSi party back on the path it led. It is clear to anyone with some common knowledge that the NSi voter is not exactly enthusiastic about Golob’s victory and the content of the coalition agreement, which is strongly marked by the views of the Levica party. Does she want the party’s popularity to decline again? She certainly cannot miss an opportunity to stay quiet.
