By: Kavarna Hayek
In parliamentary democracies, where a governing coalition is usually formed by political parties of a similar ideological background, it is quite common for position and opposition to be in conflict. This means that they are ideologically on opposite sides and that each side has a desire for pride and political (worldview) struggle. If one side does not have this, it does not have its own principles to challenge the other side, then there is no conflict. It is also absent if one side (the opposition) completely submits to the will of the ruling coalition, thus losing the desire to resist and survive. We can then say that the government side has absorbed the opposition. The situation becomes even more worrying when the opposition not only submits but enthusiastically welcomes the conqueror (the coalition’s leading representative). And exactly the latter is expected by the dominant media, which enthroned Robert Golob in the last election as the winner.
Of course, we will never know exactly what drove people to vote so massively for Robert Golob’s party. If this were to be established, each voter would have to say why he or she voted for the Sun King of the Littoral at the time he or she filled out the ballot. Since this is not possible, it is all just guesswork and never proven theories. I think that brainwashing by demonising the SDS party and the right-wing has done its thing, as I mentioned above. But I will not deal with this here, but with the part of Golob’s address when voting for the candidate for Prime Minister.
If the national television portal correctly summed up Golob’s words, the phrase “a better future” first jumped out at me. This phrase, which varies from a “bright” to a “better” future, is a typical phrase used by the Communists (from the Bolsheviks to the Yugoslav Communists). It is light propaganda……