By Andrej Sekulović
If migration continues, immigrants will simply outvote Europeans. They are supported mainly by leftists, but also by some center and even center-right parties. Former US President George Bush also recently expressed support for migrant imports.
Jean-Marie Le Pen, the former president of the French National Front and the father of Marie Le Pen, who later renamed the party the National Assembly, said in an interview, when he was still the party leader, that Europeans will lose the battle for our existence in the polls if we did not stop the mass migration. He said that if mass migrations continue, there will be no revolution or war, as there will be no need for that. Due to their large number, migrants will be able to legally take over France and other countries pursuing an open border policy and enthrone the Sharia government as described by the French writer Michel Houellebecq in his dystopian novel Submission.
Who benefits from mass migration?
Le Pen was not wrong in his predictions, only that for now immigrants support more left-wing and liberal parties, although in recent years they have also started establishing their own parties and political movements in some European countries. Certainly, modern liberal leftists are well aware of this. They are the main supporters of the import of migrants to Europe by promising faster granting of citizenship and asylum, as well as by supporting non-governmental organisations which, under the guise of philanthropy, are destroying the European gene pool by importing foreign immigrants. Otherwise, immigrants are not the most enthusiastic about some of the views of the liberal left, such as the fierce support for same-sex communities and lobbies and the feminist struggle for “women’s rights”. However, they will definitely vote for the left because of all the benefits it offers, as well as out of fear of right-wing governments that would limit migration and the flow of state money into the pockets of unemployed migrants or, as recently, introduce compulsory knowledge of the language as a condition for residence. Therefore, immigrants prefer to support left-wing parties, even if they are not very big supporters of their candidates, who, in case of victory, simplify the process of acquiring citizenship and import their future voters through open border policy. This is also the case here, as the programme of the Levica party states that they will “provide all immigrants with more free forms of learning Slovene and integration into society”, that they will “facilitate the acquisition of refugee status and improve the situation of refugees, and eliminate recent changes in asylum legislation, which are contrary to international law”. A few years ago, before the European elections, SD party president Tanja Fajon bought votes from the Albanian community with a promise to abolish visas for Kosovo. In its programme, SD also promises that they will strive for “the successful integration of immigrants through comprehensive measures for education, work, accommodation and integration into the community”.
Immigrant mobilisation
The left also benefits with immigrants primarily as a reserve army, which can always be mobilised against successful right wing parties and movements. A good example of this was the last US election, when minorities voted for Biden en masse, not because they would particularly admire him, but because they wanted to prevent Trump from winning again. With the help of mass migrations, the left also maintains its cultural and media hegemony in the West. Firstly, by repeatedly convincing immigrants and minority communities that their poverty is the result of “systemic racism” and “white privilege”, due to which then angry immigrants are willing to respond to left wing calls against white patriotic and right wing movements and parties on the street and also in the media, where they make statements with crocodile tears about how they feel “threatened”. And secondly, they want to prevent mass manifestations of European resistance that could severely shake the foundations of their hegemony by importing migrants and demographically replacing them so in the long term there would be a dwindling number of ethnic Europeans. Of course, globalists are also aware of all this, which is why they are creating “refugee crises” and financially support the import of migrants to Europe and the West, indirectly through funding of left parties and movements, and directly through donations to NGOs that literally import migrants to Europe.
The hypocrisy of the left
In George Orwell’s famous 1984 novel, citizens living under Big Brother’s rule are forced into “double thinking”. This means that in accordance with political changes and ideological upheavals, the ruling parties must be able to simply dismiss certain things that are no longer in line with the official positions of the rulers. Apparently, the gurus of cultural Marxists and left wing demagogues instilled such thinking in the minds of their members, as it is otherwise difficult to explain certain contradictions that appear in the ideological landscape of the liberal left. On the one hand, leftists vehemently oppose patriarchy, the core family and all traditional or truly “conservative” values, and on the other hand, in addition to feminism and LGBT ideology, they equally support the mass import of immigrants who believe that homosexuality is a mortal sin, are violent towards women who they consider inferior, while strictly adhering to their own traditions, making the integration that left wing liberals dream of a failure. So leftists want to fight against Europe’s “oppressive” traditional values that stand in the way of their global liberal utopia by importing to Europe crowds of people who follow the dogmas of their religion and are much more “patriarchal”, or by leftist standards “conservative”, than an average European right winger, who, in their view, is the source of all evil. Of course, some leftists are simply “ignorant”, that allows them to have Orwell’s “double thinking”. On the other hand, it is hard to believe that Brussels liberals and long-time left wing politicians are not aware of these contradictions, who, on the one hand, support the import of migrants and, on the other, advocate homosexuality and feminism. No, they are pure hypocrites and opportunists, as they see only their own interests.
Support for migration elsewhere
Of course, it is not only the far-left parties in the West that support mass migration today. Open border policy is often supported by center and even center-right or conservative parties. It is also not just about importing new voters, but immigrants are a source of cheap labour force for large corporations as well as new consumers. Such corporations have in their pockets politicians of all colours who are willing to serve the interests of globalists. Thus, in the US, so-called neoconservatives are supporters of mass migrants, and in Europe we find many such politicians in the European People’s Party. In the United States, it was Democrat Biden who caused the current migrant crisis on the southern border, but many wars, which resulted in an increase in migration, were cooked up by neoconservatives. Former US President George W. Bush has recently spoken out in support of mass migration, still urging Congress to import more cheap labour and legal migrants under “anyone willing to work” legislation, which he proposed 17 years ago. He recently told the Washington Post: “Increased migration that focuses on employment and labour skills should be a choice that would be supported by both sides.” Bush lost popularity during his presidency precisely because of plans that included more migration and more foreign workers. Of course, it should be noted that parties and politicians who support mass migration, even if they traditionally come from the right-wing or have a “conservative” in their name, are moving more and more to the left.