The coronavirus has marked the time in which we live, and it has especially marked us. In the spring time, when the Chinese virus spread all the way to our places, did not sober us up. We successfully stopped that wave because effective measures were taken in time and because we more or less adhered to them. The government has adopted anti-corona packages to mitigate the consequences, so the “lockdown” did not affect individuals and the standard as it would have otherwise.
Then came summer which we spent differently with a relatively small presence of the virus. Some were still more or less at home and doing necessary errands, while others were carefree on vacation and going on various parties either as part of public events or as private parties. It makes no sense to mention the street protests of the retarded, as they have become better known with the help of the media than the dangers posed by coronavirus infection, and have been supported by parties that are now unified in a so-called coalition of the constitutional arc with Jože Damijan at the top.
Anyone who hasn’t browsed the internet at least a little was surprised when the autumn wave arrived. Those of us who had the desire and the will to get to know how the virus works, spreads, and persists a little more closely were not at all surprised and we even predicted it.
To fight by all means and above all for our political prestige, we got the so-called Coalition of the Constitutional Arc. It consists of one primary and four secondary components. This is the basis represented by the famous Jože Damijan, who has so far been more or less the successor of Jože Mencinger and the court economist of Levica, for whom we know from experience that he is never right in his claims. The following are the political parties Lista Marjan Šarec, Social Democrats, Levica, Alenka Bratušek‘s party.
This coalition has been straining its bow lately, especially against people who would like to maintain their health and live peacefully. Until the proclamation of this artificial political formation of deathly conflicting elements in the past, the listed parties rejected almost all measures that would help keep the virus from spreading, and now this is suddenly supposed to be their main focus.
Some representatives of the fairy-tale coalition of the Constitutional Arc have in the past torn masks from their faces in the National Assembly, others have thrown them on the floor and rejected the profession gathered at the National Institutes of Health, government expert groups and elsewhere. Most of them openly supported the rejection of all government measures, and the Social Democrats joined forces with school trade union, Branimir Štrukelj, and urged schools not to follow instructions that children wear masks in schools.
All of these parties refuse to install virus-tracking applications, which is an important tool for epidemiologists to track infections. In certain circumstances, there is actually no other way to trace who the infected was in contact with. This tool was publicly rejected and on social networks posts with photos and explanations of why they will not install the application started circling.
Anyway, all the explanations around the world as to why we should not install an application that saves lives are foolish, but the text of Alenka Bratušek, the president of the party that bears her name, stood out the most. She stated that she would not download the application until it was unequivocally clear that Aleš Hojs could not follow her in her movements. It is not known what kind of movement she is talking about.
In addition to not being able to track individuals with an open source app, the statement is overpowering, arrogant and ignorant. Why would anyone want to follow any “movement” of this lady? Besides the party that bears her name, does she have any other secret movement to overthrow the government? Maybe because she likes to be the center of attention herself? Probably, that is why she takes care of her public image in a rather unusual way throughout her presence in politics. Let us remember her tiger clothes and, above all, the shoes on which she had her name and the position of Prime Minister written on. Lol! Unfortunately, it is not possible to say much positive about her work in politics. Her springboard was Zoran Janković’s party Positive Slovenia (PS), which every Slovene today knows what to think about, so she disappeared from the political scene. Alenka Bratušek’s party is still waiting for the same future, as it is literally extracted from the PS and is therefore her remnant/waste and nothing more.
Support for the self-proclaimed PV, who branded the former minister as a whore at the dance
The four parties LMŠ, SD, Levica and SAB unanimously supported Jože Damijan, who volunteered as a prime minister. They say they have brought their positions closer. About what? That the government must leave with the proper support of the electorate and that the government belongs to those who have 39 votes in parliament out of the required at least 46? But I don’t deal with that today.
I would like to highlight Alenka Bratušek and her party Alenka Bratušek, which represents the interests of Alenka Bratušek. Alenka Bratušek, through the rest of the Positive Slovenia party, declaratively stands for pensioners and women’s rights.
Let’s look at this in one sentence. She has not yet achieved anything for pensioners, and she advocates for women’s rights by supporting Jože Damijan, who has described the former minister Aleksandra Pivec as a whore at a dance. On one occasion, Damijan wisely composed the following tweet: “As we say in Styria: she will go like a whore from a dance when JJ no longer needs her. And this will be at the first vote in parliament when DeSUS will no longer provide votes. It’s clear to everyone except her.”
After Alenka Bratušek, together with her “archers”, supported a man who vulgarly dealt with a woman, they rushed to a tweet that did not reach a tenth of Damijan’s “value”. The continuation of events raises the question of whether Alenka Bratušek stands for the rights of all women or perhaps all women with the exception of Aleksandra Pivec.
In response to her statement that she would not install an application on her phone that would help infectologists to keep track of the virus, where she wrote “I will not install it until it is unequivocally clear that Aleš Hojs cannot follow me when moving”, the following tweet was posted: “Years ago this was the type of woman you found lonely in discos between three and four o’clock in the morning. You could have taken them around the corner. #NaduteDomišljavke”.
The tweet, which is a reaction to Alenka Bratušek’s tweet and her creation of a general impression in the public, was massively attacked by perverts and others who are either anonymous or have nothing to show as a result of their work. At least it is not known that they achieved anything important. They reacted angrily, primitively and insultingly and rushed en masse into the match to see who would prove better. A few statements at the end of this article, but first “affected” Alenka and the Women’s Forum of the SD party and the secretary of the SAB party.
Faking justice and double standards
Alenka Bratušek attached the tweet as a screen capture to her next comment: “This is not an attack on me personally, but on all the women who dare to stand up for themselves, for women and our better future! Probably banning abortion is the next step! Let us stand together in the fight FOR rights and AGAINST the humiliation of women! #respect #equality #courage #women @SABParty”
First, we can see that she changed the subject and once again did not hit the point in the answer. The tweet was an attack on all the women posing for themselves? Where does she see that? Is Alenka Bratušek a fighter for women’s rights? Is she fighting for the right for them to be infected with the virus? If she was to seriously deal with any rights, everyone would surely notice it, and now even women do not perceive it.
What if her policy was commented that the actions of the SAB party and Alenka Bratušek are not an attack on a single person, but an attack on all people who strive to get rid of the coronavirus and take the side of the epidemiological profession, for health and our better future? Probably banning abortion is the next step! Let’s stand together FOR health, the right to be born and AGAINST underestimating the intelligence of most people!?
So what does Alenka Bratušek stand for?
In the past, we saw Alenka Bratušek singing Bandero rosso warmly in the Stožice hall and visibly experiencing the peak of emotions while listening to a song that mentioned the Brussels cravat band. We know that she proposed herself as the Commissioner of the European Commission and in this way wanted to join this “gang of Kravatars”. Along many others present there, of course. It’s worth watching that embarrassing clip often. We are talking about hypocrisy, yes! These are content and places that should be seriously discussed and condemned, not to mention the discos of the 1980s. We’re still together and we’re following the problem, aren’t we? Is this a commitment to women’s and pensioners’ rights? Of course not, this is a pronounced ideology and populism. The first (ideology) they want to protect and strengthen in the SAB, and the second (populism) they want to spread in order to stay in politics.
Women from the Women’s Forum of the SD party, which operates within one of the four parties, also came forward, uniting with Jože Damjan, who described Aleksandra Pivec as a whore at the dance. They wrote the following: “Enough insults. FOR the rights and AGAINST the humiliation of women!”
The author of the attacked tweet responded: “I am joining; no one should be offended. Neither women nor men. If your post refers to my tweet, you are mistaken. I did not offend anyone. At least not personally, but if someone recognized themselves in it, I’m sincerely sorry.”
Apparently they did not understand the tweet. More than anything else, it concerned the modus operandi and the approach defending the position here, I am the most important. If I/we were not the most important, it would be someone else, and we will not allow that (paraphrase of Dolanc’s statement about the communists).
Common sense really finds it hard to define a tweet as a personal insult. It might be inappropriate under normal circumstances, but in Slovenia we have not had normal conditions on the political stage for a long time. And not thanks to the normal, but to the opposition, if we can afford another parallel statement. This time in parallel with the one that says that he was once a right-wing journalist, but then switched to the normal side. This was stated by the deputy of LMŠ, another party, that united with Jože Damijan, who wrote a tweet that Aleksandra Pivec is a whore at the dance, Brane Golubovič. He said: “We have one journalist who wrote for right-wing newspapers and is a normal journalist today.”
Another representative of one of the four political parties operating under the arc of Jože Damijan with a special attitude towards Aleksandra Pivec felt called to comment. This is Jerca Korče from the Marjan Šarc List party. She wrote, “How can anyone afford such a record?? On top of all that, this individual is a candidate for deputy in the European elections.”
The author of the condemned tweet did not find Jerča’s comment worth commenting on, as we know that she is a Member of Parliament who likes to lie, which has already been officially proven by the publication of a magnetogram from the National Assembly that was inconsistent with her previous statements.
The secretary of Alenka Bratušek’ party, chaired by Alenka Bratušek, Jernej Pavlič, also raised the shield in defence of her boss. He went wider and wrote in his tweet: “Are you women in @SDSparty treated like that?” He also attached the Twitter addresses of SDS deputies: @ANJABAHZIBERT @NadaBrinovsek @mojcaskrinjar @Karmen_Furman @EvaIrglL @ElenaUsaj @jelka_godec @AlenkaJerajSDS @IvanusaLidija.
We all see that Alenka Bratušek appears as a person and as a political party?
He received the answer: “Dear Mr. Pavlič. I do not treat anyone specifically. Even a tweet does not apply to anyone personally, it’s just connected to your boss. Believe me, I do not treat her either, but with her arrogance she reminded me of the described scene in Ljubljana, when you were still a preschool child. I hope she is not like that.”
Then an addition: “And yes, if she continues to see herself in this story, tell her I sincerely apologise to her. She blocked me a long time ago (characteristically). I did not mean she was ever in a disco club. Really, it was just an association.”
The author of the tweet, who was attacked by hunters of imaginary affairs on the political right, was none other than the author of this column.
Jernej Pavlič immediately blocked me on Twitter after my explanation and apology. His style is escape. The secretary of the SAB and the SAB parliamentary group, Jernej Pavlič, is the gentleman who was caught by the police about two years ago when he was making a phone call while driving. Instead of taking responsibility for his offense, he fled to the National Assembly premises and later escaped from it in some group. Jernej Pavlič is a man whom Alenka Bratušek’s party estimates suitable to be her secretary. They can have him, they can run away with him, and the voters should consider whether they will allow us to be continuously treated by politicians like Alenka Bratušek, Maša Kociper, Marko Bandelli, Andrej Rajh, Angelika Mlinar and similar calibres. Anyone who follows them at least a little knows that they jump on every little thing and point their finger at others, but they never see themselves. This time it was me by chance. It is time for their outlines to disappear around the corner of the parliament outside the parliamentary doorstep and reunite with Zoran Janković’s Positive Slovenia, which is already there – far around the corner and at the bottom of the political periphery.
In the eighties, I professionally followed the Ljubljana scene even after three in the morning. To those who hung helplessly on the counters (men and women) at this part of the night because they failed to find attention, we said desperate people who get lost alone at the corners of buildings at dawn or in bizarre company. One time someone took one and vice versa. These were the kind of people who were convinced that they were always right, so they had friends for a shorter time. Doesn’t this remind you of a part of today’s politics, which is also represented by Alenka Bratušek? They were interesting to me personally, but I would not have them for company. I could tell stories about them for hours and hours. They were not usually seen during the day. Like the works of politics, it is not to be seen when the real interests of the state and the people must be upheld. Fortunately, all of us are in opposition this time.
Alenka Bratušek’s message and rejection of the application is first and foremost reminiscent of seeking attention and feeling in the darkness of her own loss, which is quite possible to connect with the desperate people of the nightlife in the past. It is not said that Mrs. Bratušek is the one from the night scene, it is just a way of working. If the tweet had been more politically correct, it would certainly not have been noticed and would not have achieved its purpose. In fact, it is unfortunate that we no longer hear each other in a calm way, and we therefore have hunters for our privileges in politics on an increasing scale, instead of representors of interests of the people. Since the tweet was not shrouded in fog, like left-wing politics, it at least partially achieved its purpose, but unfortunately we were able to see once again how many purists are on the left, running into the record like pigs in pumpkins.
Let’s take a look at some responses to the tweet that “warned” of its inappropriateness and condemned it.
Private Messages:
“Aren’t you ashamed of being impotent… And you consider yourself a politician??? Do you happen to be related to Janša’s litter? Maybe someone took yours for a drive around the corner. Pack up and get ready to leave with the big leader and the rest of the leeches…”
“Are you already packing you dirty leech? 5.11.2020 is fast approaching… will you be so brave then and come to explain certain things to a crowd of people in front of the parliament or your house? Well, maybe I’ll see you on your weekend, too.”
“Have you already told Janez you’re a faggot?”
“Shit.”
Here are some more selected tweets below the post:
“Pious desires of a legally (it is not known what “legally” means) incompetent Janšizm. The woman could at least walk home on her own. “
“Yeah you certainly couldn’t take anything around the corner except your wheelchair. P.S.: it’s time to change your diaper, it stinks up here.”
“I doubt you’ve got a woman in your life. Maybe Uncle Vinko caressed you, but he’s not a woman.”
“For fools like you, there’s a cure, a bullet in the forehead, if you it’s on me?!” “You can be taken around the corner at any time. #legsnotworking”
Some commentators did not go that far, but they clearly sided with the one-sided notion of morality. Their expression of morality is often a lie, just another disgusting lie.
Someone also commented that there is no need to compete who can go lower. Is it possible to go beyond promoting non-compliance with life-saving measures and playing a duplicitous role towards the EU, pensioners and women? On the other hand, the only eternal allegiance is bandera rossa.