Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s “State of the Nation” address

[Former] President of the Republic, [former] Prime Minister, Mr. Speaker, Mayor of Budapest, Ladies and Gentlemen, It is a pleasure to see you here again. I am always surprised by how many people come to my state of the nation addresses. Although if I think about it, it’s understandable for people to be curious to see whether the Prime Minister is able to say anything new. I’m also curious about that, and so that’s why I’m here as well. If I had to summarise this assessment of the past year in a single sentence, I would say this: may every year be at least as good as 2018 was! We won our third consecutive two-thirds majority in a parliamentary election, and the Hungarian economy grew by some 5 per cent. If you suspect that there’s some kind of link there, you’re not mistaken.

  • Written by
  • Read: 38 times

SDS Party President Janez Janša: A System for the Elite, First-Class (1st picture)

A system that primarily serves the elite is in place in Slovenia. The self-selected, self-proclaimed elite. First class. They use all means to maintain authority, their status and privileges. One of the most catastrophic consequences of this system in the long run is the erosion of human capital and basic elements of Slovenian statehood.

  • Written by
  • Read: 111 times

New Brutal Attack on Freedom of Speech! Man Goes on Trial for Criticizing a Teacher Who Indoctrinated Children with LGBT Ideology!

We have highlighted years ago, in the weekly Demokracija magazine and on our website, the increasingly present LGBT ideology and the theory of gender in the Slovenian school system. However, that is not all – in many western countries this has become part of the officially prescribed "political correctness" (or new totalitarianism), since these ideologies and their promotors must not be criticized. This is clearly spreading in Slovenia as well.

  • Written by
  • Read: 120 times

Lana Lokteff: The West Needs To Go Through A Death And A Rebirth

Lana Lokteff is among most known personalities of new political right, that become prominent in recent years. Due practical monopoly influence political left has in mainstream media, new right uses alternative way to promote right ideas, most notable podcasts, vlogs, social media in general. Web media company Red Ice where Lana for decade regularry comment on political and social issues, has 300 regular subscribers with tens of thousands random daily visitors. Among them are obviously leftists too as they constantly put pressure on mainstream politics and web giants executives to shut down Red Ice and thus Lana as well. This leftist efforts are proof of Lana influence on political and social issues in current western society.

Currently the main topic on migration issues is implementation of so called »Global pact on migration«. Would you agree that this pact is very dangerous document?

Yes! In short, this pact not only supports endless open borders into European nations but the agreement also wants to criminalize any criticism of mass immigration! So if Europeans oppose this pact, which is in line with the UN's 'replacement migration' agenda, it may become a criminal offense to speak out against it.

All those who oppose mass migrations and the destruction of Western traditions are regularly labeled by globalists as racists, neo-Nazis, xenophobes, etc. What do you think about these labels?

Of course they are ridiculous and used by people who cannot debate. These loaded terms are racial slurs used against White people, who oppose blatant anti-White politics. No other people on Earth are called racists, xenophobes or Nazis for wanting their people to remain a majority in their nation. These words are used to guilt and shame European people into becoming a minority in their country.

When they attack you with above mentioned level, how do you react? Do you argue, try to explain your position or you just shrug them off?

It depends who I am speaking to but people rarely say these things to my face because they know they'll have to actually debate me. They usually post comments or write articles online attacking me instead. If in person, I laugh and then ask them a few very basic but powerful questions which I know they cannot answer without sounding like a hypocrite.

Would you agree that "progressive" movements goal is to deliberately weaken West and made it incapable of resisting this invasion of the Third World?

Yes but the invasion by the 3rd world is only made possible by White and Jewish elites in the west who have opened the borders. I think the ultimate plan is to weaken, shame and destroy European people to the point where they no longer care to exist as a people, making it easy to replace them and take what they've built. White people stand in the way of globalists doing whatever they want. Watch my video called, Why They Want To Replace White People which has already had 800,000 views.

Would you agree with the assessment that mass migration is not the only threat to the traditions and culture of Western civilization? That the same pervasive threat is represented by various pacifist, LGBT and other »progressive« movements promoted by the left liberal Western elites?

Yes, we can clearly see that. Even if mass immigration wasn't happening, leftist mentality has divided and weakened Europeans like nothing else. We've become sick mentally and emotionally and have lost touch with all things natural, beautiful and healthy. Our families are broken, people aren't having children, feminists constantly attack men, women are proud to be called sluts, obesity is called 'body positivity,' adults and children are given hormones to change their sex or remove their genitals, and there is constant contempt for true strength and beauty. Additionally, we've become self hating blaming the entire world's problems on European people and racism. It's a mess.

In your opinion, why cultural Marxism get so alarming level of acceptance mainly among youth?

It mostly comes from Hollywood. Turn on any movie or TV show and you will find cultural Marxist programming, same with modern music. Young kids are constantly hit with subliminal programming in entertainment but also blatant messages in school. The educational system in most western nations is dominated by Marxists and so is media and entertainment. The edgy underground counter culture is now us.

Universities were once places, where one could exchange ideas, learn, even challenge taboos. Now they are indoctrination camps. What on your opinion went wrong and how to fix this appaling situation?

Our universities have been taken over by sly Marxists and communists long ago. They covertly took up these positions while the opposition to them became lazy and too trusting. When they became the majority in the system, they blocked anyone not like them from getting in. The answer is for us to take back those institutions in a similar way and that is what they are so paranoid about because they know it worked for them. We should also build our own....again.

Women that reject feminist agenda, almost always face slurs that they are brainwashed/uneducated or too weak to »leave patriarchy« or simply that they are stupid. How do you respond on such slurs?

I tell them then it's obvious they don't actually know any nationalist anti-feminist women! They can listen to the many great women I have interviewed on this topic.

Dont you find interesting, that all those so called empowered, independant etc. feminists in fact hang on government support and handouts?

Haha, yes they claim they don't need a man but then use and take everything men have built or created. It's a lie. Ofcourse women need men just like men need women. It's not supposed to be a competition but a joint effort. If feminists don't have children, they are doing us a favor in the long run.

Left liberal elites already control most mainstream media and now they are out trying to censor world web. Why such fear?

They fear us because we have the truth that will undo their years of propaganda, lies and brainwashing. If people really know, it would be game over for them. They have billions of dollars and still they are failing and media outlets like ours are increasingly popular with shoe string budgets. It's why they now turn to totalitarian censorship and banning. They are desperate, not strong. Censorship never works in the long run but they will try.

Some web operators cave to left liberal pressure and started to purge known »rightwingers« from their sites.  Did Facebook, Twitter, Youtube closed your web site or account as well and what was the reason, if any given? 

We are under attack. We've literally had politicians and various interest groups calling for YouTube to delete our channel. We just received a strike 2 from YouTube for reporting on a migrant who raped and killed a German woman. They claimed we were guilty of 'hate speech.' Outrageous! We are the problem for pointing out and being against rape and violence?! One more strike and our channel with 300,000 subscribers will be deleted. It won't make us shut up and go away though.

Both Europe and USA are damaged with impact of cultural Marxism as well with immigration problems. However level of damage, means to resist, ways how political right responds to threat are different. Can you, at least in general, highlight those differences?

If I understand you correctly, you are asking the different ways in which those on the right are responding to leftist politics destroying the west.

In Europe, nationalist groups are getting increasingly popular for good reason. They are working on a political level and running for positions in government. Europe is more diverse when it comes to parties that can run, unlike America and the tight 2 party system. After Trump, most true nationalists (who want European Americans to remain the majority) realized that nothing could really be done via politics in America, for now anyway. Trump did try to limit immigration but the masters behind the curtain showed him his limits fairly quickly. Anything good he's tried to do has been shut down. No wall will be built. His presidency has been better for Israel than America.

In America, nationalists are working more on a cultural and social level to influence and spread their ideas. Their commentary is starting to enter into the mainstream political discourse.

I'd say both European and American nationalists need to get better at forming organized interest groups who fight for their interests and against political censorship and discrimination.

And on the end, your opinion- could we avoid destruction of western civilisation or we already passed point of no return?

I think we are at the point where we need to help push it to the ground so we can rebuild and keep aspects we like and throw out aspects that never should've been incorporated to begin with, like liberal mindset. The west needs to go through a death and a rebirth and I welcome that. We as a people need to go through the fire to come out stronger and more refined.

  • Written by
  • Read: 1671 times

Šarec's Government Confirms it Aims to Destroy Opposition Media!

Šarec’s government confirmed on Tuesday's Odmevi (TV Slovenia program) that it will carry out the announced changes in the area of media legislation. The amendment of the law on media will undoubtedly step on the toes of media that will not report agreeably, that is, pro-government. The media will have to answer for the spread of alleged hate speech.

  • Written by
  • Read: 197 times

A Woman is Not a Frog! Šarec’s Government to Give 50 Thousand Euros to Brainwash Boys About "Exceeding Stereotypes"

It is a new day and a new project by Marjan Šarec’s government, with which they want to further brainwash people. This time, the Orwellian Ministry of Labor, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities published a public call for co-financing projects in the field of equality between women and men for 2019, with which they want to draw attention to "violence during dating" and devote themselves to "working with boys for overcoming stereotypes". Sounds familiar?

  • Written by
  • Read: 163 times

Keith Miles: The Return of Marxism?

This is of course an astonishing question to ask. Why anyone would want to believe in Marxism is a modern mystery? Its partner in crime - socialism seems in the modern situation to ignore its disastrous past.

  • Written by
  • Read: 196 times

Eamonn Butler, Director of the Adam Smith Institute: Freedom and democracy are important: so important that nobody dares be against them

We talked with British economist Eamon Butler, the director and co-founder of the Adam Smith Institute in the United Kingdom. He graduated from the University of St. Andrews. In 2012, he received an honorary doctorate at Heriot-Watt University. He is the author of several books and expert articles in the field of economics.

  • Written by
  • Read: 174 times

Photo Gallery! Patriotic Protesters in Front of National Assembly Critical of Government's Signature of Infamous Marrakesh Declaration! This is Treason for Slovenia!

The patriotic protests took place in the Republic Square in Ljubljana, blocking the traffic in front of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia. Protesters also blocked the entrance to the parliament, which was closed for the time being. It is estimated that between 300 and 400 people have gathered, however the number was difficult to assess due to constant new arrivals. The United Nations’ Compact on Migration, which Slovenia has scandalously confirmed in Marrakesh, along with some more than 150 countries, contains recommendations for the formation of national policies in the area of migration, State Secretary at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Sandi Čurin, told STA. The fact that about 40 countries did not confirm it, however, according to him, does not mean anything drastic. Oh really? Such allegedly "non-binding international documents", as experience shows, will soon become mandatory for national states.

On Monday, in Morocco, Marrakesh, representatives of the UN member states have confirmed the UN's Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. It was joined by Slovenia as well. On December 19, the resolution will be approved by the UN General Assembly. Because of the infamous Marrakesh agreement, civil and independent political initiatives have already called on the government to publicly cancel the intended departure of the delegation to Marrakesh and the signing of the declaration. However, by the deadline on Sunday, December 9, the government did not listen to the will of the people, so as expected and according to their forecasts, there was a physical occupation of the streets in the center of Ljubljana.

Protesters have gathered in front of the parliament first, protesting against the adoption of the Marrakesh Declaration, while vehicles of the demonstrators were visible on Šubičeva street. The question was if the street would be blocked until the government leaves the harmful agreement.

The Government Was Warned of the Protest!

Several civil initiatives wrote a Letter to Prime Minister Marjan Šarec to publicly cancel the departure of the delegation to Marrakesh and the signing of the Marrakesh Declaration: “Dear Mr Šarec! We hope that you are aware that you have come to lead the government with a group of parties with which you have received 4.91 per cent of the vote. Therefore, you have no right to sign something that can affect the fate of the people”. They noted that the signing of this document would be detrimental to the future of the Slovenian nation and they marked the signature as treason that would destabilize and destroy national states.

 A Blockade of Ljubljana Center?

 Therefore, they have set a deadline for the government to publicly cancel the departure to Marrakesh and the signing of the declaration, until December 9th at midnight. “Failing to do this, on December 10, 2018, at 12 o'clock in the evening, we will massively occupy the streets and markets in Ljubljana and force you with all the legitimate and legal peaceful means available to ordinary citizens, to irrevocably resign and to inform the whole world public that the Slovenian delegation in Marrakesh is against the will of the people and does not have the mandate to sign the proposed declaration”. In addition, they wrote that in Slovenia the citizens exercise their power directly and through elections, according to the principle of separation of powers on the legislative, executive and judicial power.

The Public Does Not Support the Adoption of the Marrakesh Agreement!

According to the opinion poll conducted by Parsifal for Nova24TV, the majority of respondents believe that the Marrakesh Declaration should be rejected because it will harm the countries to which migrants come. 54.2 percent of respondents agree with this claim. Only 19.3 percent of respondents believe that the said declaration should be supported because it will additionally protect the rights of migrants, while 26.4 percent of respondents consider that they do not know enough and thus cannot take a stand.

Bernard Brščič: It is the Cowardice of the Slovenian Government!

One of the protesters, who presented himself as a member of the Committee on Equal Opportunities, explained that they are fighting “to have at least about the same chance in the election so that the voice of the common person is heard. We are also in solidarity with protesters in Europe with similar problems – their voice in official institutions is not heard”. “In France too, it is not just about protests against fuel taxes, but a set of reasons why this is the case. The Front National Stance and the Liberation of Society covers all political colors and parties," he explained.

He also stated that they did not stop the traffic. "I know, however, that there were calls for a spontaneous protest to take place in a slightly different way, not just with statements. We have been protesting for a long time, but we have no real interlocutor with any institution", he explained. According to his estimates, about 300 people gathered at the protest, organized by the "Conscious People of Slovenia" movement.

Among the demonstrators in front of the National Assembly, who oppose the signing of the UN Compact on Migration, was also Vili Kovačič. He said that they are protesting because of the agreement and other problems, among which he pointed out democracy and elections. "I called on four presidents in a letter that the decision of the Constitutional Court, which stipulates the need to remedy the democratic standards, the laws of democracy and elections, has to be taken seriously. The deadline was one year, however since then no one has touched on the issues in the parliament. The deadline will expire on January 15”, he said.

"First of all, we must restore the national sovereignty of this country and through it conquer this liberalization element of the society so that people become free to be able to decide on important issues by their own will. That is not the case now, the will of the people is despised, the referendum provisions are despised, 99% of people are despised”, said Gašper Ferjan, a member of the Democratic Committee.

“Our demands are the regulation of the referendum and electoral legislation. Borut Pahor, the President of Slovenia, pointed out that if the state does not reorganize itself, alternative institutions will be created”, he added.

Some protesters estimated that Slovenia’s signing the UN Compact on Migration is a form of treason. “This is also recognized by top politicians who squeezed the tail between their legs and entrusted the signing of the declaration to an unimportant state official. If you want the Marrakesh Declaration to become part of the Slovenian legal order, it should be ratified by the National Assembly. This ratification, however, will not be made possible since, before the second reading, there is a possibility to file an initiative for a referendum”, says Bernard Brščič, a publicist, who, despite different facts, insists that the agreement is an international treaty, which is not ratified, yet it will have legal consequences.

“This is about the cowardice of the Slovenian government. If the Prime Minister was a man, he would go to Marrakesh and sign the treason himself”, Brščič said. Other protesters, critical of politics and the media, also agreed with him.

  • Written by
  • Read: 160 times

SDS Party Welcomes the Establishment of Parliamentary Inquiry Commission: This is How We Will Determine How Much Left Parties Have Received from the Laundered Iranian Billion in the NLB!

The Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) welcomes the establishment of an inquiry commission to deal with the financing of political parties from abroad. Thus, we will be able to determine the share of commissions from the laundered billion of Iranian euros through the state-owned NLB bank, received by the SD, DeSUS, Zares and LDS parties, as well as what proportion of commissions were given to individuals in the leadership positions of the List of Marjan Šarec Party, how much the Croatian tycoon Branko Roglić donated to the SMC Party and the extent to which foreign capital in the Pro Plus company participates in the continuous promotion of left parties LMŠ, SMC, SD, DeSUS, SAB and Levica.

(EXCLUSIVE) Sandi Čurin, the Man Who Shall Sign the Marrakesh Declaration, Which Signifies High Treason of the Slovenian Nation

“The Head of the delegation of the Republic of Slovenia at the conference in Marrakesh will be State Secretary at the Ministry of the Interior (MNZ) mag. Sandi Čurin. The latter will confirm the political commitment of Slovenia to the global compact on migration”, wrote the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in response to Demokracija Magazine’s question.

  • Written by
  • Read: 205 times

Legal Experts on the Appeal of Slovenian Prime Minister Marjan Šarec: The Appeal Against Advertising in Media, which Supposedly Spreads Hostile Content, Went Too Far. If the Prime Minister Crosses this Rubicon, that is Not Good!

A few days ago, Prime Minister Marjan Šarec had a scandalous response to the debate on whether it is appropriate for the partly or majority state-owned companies to advertise in media, which allegedly spreads hostile content. He believes that their readers can understand such advertising as active support for what is written, and called to consider: "Does the desire for profit really justify the tolerance of intolerance?" By declaring that he does “not support advertising in the media that spreads hostile content", the Prime Minister is seriously crossing the line of the politically acceptable, if he is placed as the judge of what constitutes hostile content, who is deemed responsible of it and how to counter it. This is the warning, in a joint statement, of legal experts, Dr Andraž Teršek, Dr Matej Avbelj, Dr Jurij Toplak and Dr Jernej Letnar Čenič.

  • Written by
  • Read: 380 times

MEPs have sent a written question to the EC concerning the recent call by the Prime Minister Marjan Šarec in which he called on companies that are partially or majority-owned by the state to stop advertising in the media that spread hate speech

Members of the European Parliament coming from the ranks of the SDS Party Milan Zver, Romana Tomc and Patricija Šulin have sent a written question to the European Commission today concerning the recent call by the Prime Minister Marjan Šarec, published on the official website of the Prime Minister's Cabinet, in which he called on companies that are partially or majority-owned by the state to stop advertising in the media that spread hate speech.

MEPs are interested in whether such an attempt to affect action and freedom of the media is in line with the commitments to respect freedom and independence of the media to which Slovenia had committed while joining the EU. And, does the European Commission believe that such a call from the Prime Minister is also an attempt to politically influence business decisions of companies that are supposed to be freely taken by their management bodies. MEPs are also interested to know what the European Commission intends to do about this kind of behavior.

For the record, Slovenian Prime Minister Marjan Šarec recently called on companies that are partially or majority-owned by the state to stop advertising in the media that spread hate speech. The Prime Minister said yesterday that he was pleased that his call had caused quite a stir and that people began to think about it. However, the statements of the Prime Minister Marjan Šarec regarding the ban on advertising cannot be taken merely as a well-meant warning or opinion, nor we can reduce it only to "raising a stir".

According to the Association of Journalists and Publicists, such a call is dangerously reminiscent to the recent times of media censorship. It is an attempt to politically disable the functioning of the media critical of the government, from the position of power. It is known that for some time already representatives of the government parties have been criticizing the critical media for spreading hate speech, while the definition of hate speech is left to the subjective assessment of government politicians. The Association of Journalists and Publicists adds that the government's side often accuses the media of hate speech merely based on critical writing about migration or government policy in this area.

Respected Slovenian lawyers Andraž Teršek, Matej Avbelj, Jurij Toplak and Jernej Letnar Černič wrote in a public letter on freedom of expression that the Prime Minister is seriously crossing the line of politically acceptable if he appoints himself as a judge on what is a hate contents, who is responsible for it and how to oppose it. Especially, if he strongly suggests that they come only from one of the two political sides. The aforementioned lawyers add that the Prime Minister, as a human being, has the right to give such value estimations, but that he, as a prime minister, goes too far in making such a statement suggesting a general existence of hate speech as a crime in these media. In the appeal, the lawyers also point out the politically illegitimate and unacceptable pressure on the companies, on which the state has a direct impact when wholly, largely or partially included as owner or supervisor. At the same time, they propose to the Prime Minister Šarec cautiousness and prudence to not cross the limit of freedom of action and expression, which befits a Prime Minister.

In a democratic state, law enforcement and judicial authorities are those responsible to judge what exceeds the freedom of expression, which can and must under no circumstances be judged by the Prime Minister.

  • Written by
  • Read: 266 times

Scandalous: Šarec Appeals to State Companies to Consider if they Should Advertise in Media that Allegedly Spreads "Hostile Content"

Prime Minister Marjan Šarec responded to debates on whether it is appropriate for companies that are partly or mostly owned by the state to advertise in media that spread hostile content. He believes that their readers can understand such advertising as active support of the content and called to consider if "the desire for profit really justifies the tolerance of intolerance".

  • Written by
  • Read: 826 times

State Millions Obtained Fast with Psychiatry

What do the Cakić, Zidar, Radan, Olovec and Kovač "killers from Facebook" cases, and most recently the Novič case, all have in common? These are all high-profile trials and procedures in which the fate of the defendants has been adjusted and, most of all, sealed by court experts.

  • Written by
  • Read: 308 times

EPP Group: European defence to get more firepower and securing Europe as a world space power! For greater investment in science, research and infrastructure!

EPP Groupe: A long overdue strengthening of European defence capabilities is underway with the establishment of the European Defence Fund. "Only a strong and united Europe will be able to revitalise and relaunch our common space endeavour. As it is, the new Space Programme is a perfect example of what strong European cooperation can achieve", said Massimiliano Salini MEP, the European Parliament’s Spokesman on the Space Programme for 2021 to 2027. The European People's Party is also in favor of greater investment in science, research and infrastructure.

  • Written by
  • Read: 241 times

National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia at an extraordinary session on the harmful Marrakech declaration or the United Nations agreement on migration! Janša: Common Sense in your hands!

Today at the extraordinary session, the National Assembly discussed about the United Nations global agreement on migration, which the government last week illegally supported and announced that in December in Moroccan Marrakesh despite the opposition of the opposition and the majority of Slovenian public acceded to the agreement. Therefore, a protest against the controversial Marrakech declaration is taking place in front of the Slovenian National Assembly and the decision of the Slovenian government to support this disputed deal.

Members of the SDS, NSi and SNS, in their request for a meeting, proposed that the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia recommend the government to oppose the agreement on migration and inform the Slovenian public and the National Assembly about all international acts on interstate migration. It should also be recommended to encourage the EU and UN institutions to find solutions to address the causes of migration. However, on Friday the parliamentary committee for foreign policy rejected the proposal of these recommendations, so the National Assembly will not vote on them today.

In the SDS they oppose the agreement, because it equalize legal and illegal migrations, abolishes borders and accelerate migration. In the NSi, meanwhile, they believe that the agreement does not address the causes of migration in the countries of origin. They also requested a translation of the document into Slovene. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs published a working translation of the agreement on Tuesday afternoon on its website.

Last Thursday, the government supported the document and announced that Slovenia will participate in Marrakech in December in the adoption of the UN Migration Agreement. As Foreign Minister Mr. Miro Cerar underlined, this is a legally binding agreement that separates between legal and illegal migrations.

The controversial "global agreement on safe, regulated and legal migration" sets out 23 objectives for the supposedly safer and more orderly flow of people. So far, support has been denied by the great ambiguity of several countries, including the United States, Hungary, Austria, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Poland, and could still be listed.

In the National Assembly, the president of the SDS, Mr. Janez Janša, has already spoken, calling on the government to act wisely and to withdraw from the global agreement on migration! At the conclusion of his speech, he said:

"If you read this declaration with the wrong title, the name is incorrect because if any member of the United Nations, which is a permanent member of the Security Council, does not participate in an agreement, then this is not a global agreement. In fact, from the outset, when this last draft was published, all countries do not participate. Russia and China do not know that other countries, especially Western civilization countries, stand out one after the other. Yesterday, one of the coalition parties in Belgium announced that it did not support this, that is, Belgium will not support it either. So much for the core countries of the European Union, which should all stand by for this. After the CDU congress at the beginning of December in Germany, this country will probably change its position in this regard, and in the end you will be the only one on the German-French train.

So, common sense in your hands! Read the text that is here today, in which you will find everything that anyone wants. You will find articles that say that each country is sovereign, and you will find articles that de facto equalize illegal and legal migrants, refugees and migrants. The term "illegal migration", is not even used at all. However, it is written in four places "regardless of status is guaranteed, this and that ..."

Make no mistake; this is no Declaration of Human Rights. Now in this debate, we went into a side street, if you, all people, whether we are from Europe, Africa or America, have the same human rights. We have, according to the Declaration on Human Rights, a similar declaration, which is also ratified, we have, and this is not the topic. But in this document, the clear intention is that the right to migrate is slowly made for human rights, read, life at the expense of the impudence of others is done for the human right, and this is the end of a serious civilization.

Because of everything that is in this text, there will be nothing in the end, and the countries that will soon come to mind will be so much better. Look at what public opinion in Europe is like in the entire western hemisphere, even in Slovenia, 70% of people in Slovenia do not support this. And I propose that we act wisely and that the government withdraws from it. "

  1. B.
  • Written by
  • Read: 443 times
Subscribe to this RSS feed